When an AI agent breaks something, who pays?

Indian data centers, GCCs and IT services firms are set up to run more agentic AI workloads for Western clients than any country outside the US. That fact hasn’t yet made its way into how India enacts its AI regulation. Most of the global debate is still about pacing frontier labs in Silicon Valley or writing rules for the companies that build the models. India should be asking a different question: what happens to a country actually running these systems, once liability starts following the operator instead of the AI maker?

A focus on the maker is necessary but not remotely sufficient. And the natural course globally will be to start looking for “choke points” where AI is and can be controlled. India should get ahead of it rather than wait for Washington or Brussels to decide.

This article was originally published in ET Entrepreneur >

Share

More Perspectives

  • Automating the ‘future of work’

    Capria Ventures, which manages assets worth about ₹2,000 crore, is sharpening its focus on enterprise artificial intelligence (AI), manufacturing automation and the

  • The Great Token Divide

    For fifty years, the primary constraint in building with software was human skill. That constraint has now been broken. Not reduced, broken.

  • El poder transformador de la IA para emprendimientos en mercados emergentes

    En solo dos años, la inteligencia artificial (IA) pasó de ser un experimento interesante a convertirse en una capacidad crítica para los

Secret Link

Report a Grievance

Capria Ventures and its related entities are committed to the highest standards of ethics and strictly enforce a zero-tolerance anti-corruption policy. Please report any suspicious activity to grievance@capria.vc. All reports will be treated with utmost urgency and resolved appropriately.